ICANN: I had no idea coordinating web page addresses was so complex. I am happy to see the process is fairly transparent. At least someone is looking out for the good of the Internet. As far as design, I find the design very pleasing. Interesting choice of colors, with the turquoise blue and then the other blues and grays. I do like the buttons at the top instead of on the left hand side. I also like the use of lots of blank space. There's a lot of information on the site, but it never feels cramped.
Internet Traffic Report: Very interesting! I found the FAQ most helpful. They actually answered my questions, which hardly ever happens. Simple, basic, easily comprehensible. I will have to check this the next time my Internet seems slow and see what's going on. The graphs are very appealing and helpful and it's nice to be able to look at the raw data.
Internet World Stats: Wow! A good site to know about; it may be helpful if I ever need statistics about Internet usage. It seems very basic, simple and clear -- always a good idea when dealing with statistics. I really like the graphs -- very helpful in conveying the statistics.
CAIDA: No strong opinions about this one. The material seems quite boring and it's a little hard to get past that. It's a little difficult to figure out what they really do. Again, I am surprised at how basic the website is for a bunch a people who are obviously very technologically advanced. Again, I note the use of lot of white space. The larger type is a plus also, when dealing with so many complex topics.
PEW: This is one of my favorite websites so far. Maybe because I just love what they do, but it seems to strike such a nice balance between information and aesthetics. Certainly, they have a ton of information to convey, but they don't cramp it all on the front page and they leave room for lots of white space. I love the typeface and am making a note to come back to this one The colors are pleasing and it's relaxing to look at everything. There's just enough color to brighten it up in spots, ut it's not ever overwhelming. There are many things I would like to emulate here, although I'm assuming it's a good design. I guess the readings will bear that out. I hope so, anyway, because otherwise it means I don't have the ability to tell good design from bad, or I'm fooled by bad design. I like how they have their archives divided into sections. Most archive sections are difficult to find and use, but this one is very usable. Lots of interesting things here. Whoever is responsible for putting this together certainly has a good editor's deft touch, both from a content as well as an aesthetic perspective. At least, that's my opinion right now.
Nielson: Right off the bat, I don't like those ads flashing at me. It makes me feel like the site is more commercial in nature. But obviously there's a lot of good information here and this would be a good site to explore when doing competitive analysis or while putting your own site together if attracting visitors is important. I'm struck with how popular the color blue seems to be on a lot of these websites.
USF Style Guidelines: Not bad. I've never been crazy about the dark green, but I like the rest of it. And again I'll note the use of lots of white space. I like the way they break the information up and highlight the paragraphs.